Assumed cheating

A regulatory presumption triggered when an approved statistical analysis exceeds the official threshold for a performance.

This page is temporarily shown in English. Complete localization will be added in a later stage.

Explanation

Assumed cheating is an evidentiary status defined by FIDE's fair play rules. It arises when a validated algorithm or methodology analyzes a game, series of games, or tournament and produces a statistical result above the official threshold.

The analysis uses a statistic called a Z-score. In plain terms, it measures how far the observed performance lies from the model's projection for comparable players. An extreme enough result can trigger the presumption, but it does not mean that every move matched the first choice of a , a program that calculates moves, or that any brilliant performance is suspicious.

When proceedings are opened under this rule, the player must provide an explanation capable of rebutting the presumption. The case still includes evidence review and a right to respond. A signal from should not be described as an automatic conviction or a final public finding of .

Usage and context

This is a legal and statistical term in FIDE regulations, not an informal way to say that someone looks suspicious.

Common confusions

Presumption and final decision

The presumption changes the evidentiary position within a proceeding. It is not the same as a final finding of cheating.

View term
Technical failure

An may be penalized, but it does not by itself trigger this presumption.

View term

Related terms

© MindZug 2026