Explanation
The Chess Informant system replaces many recurring phrases with short signs. A reader can recognize an assessment without sharing the annotator's language. The symbols do not form a complete sentence; they are an editorial vocabulary read together with a move, position, or variation.
What it can express
- A judgment about a move, such as or “only move.”
- One side's activity, such as an , initiative, counterplay, or compensation for material.
- A positional feature, such as , a file, a diagonal, or a pawn structure.
These signs comment on the chess, but they do not replace notation that records legal moves. In , a text format for exchanging games, many comments are stored as Numeric Annotation Glyphs (NAGs): a dollar sign followed by a number. The original specification assigns meanings through $139; Chess Informant and software projects have proposed later values whose visual rendering is not always consistent.
Unicode, the digital character standard, encoded several specialized glyphs so they can be stored as real text. Even so, a font may lack them or an application may prefer a historical shape. It helps to separate three layers: the chess concept, the stored NAG number, and the character displayed on screen.
Usage and context
The system serves as a shared legend in books, magazines, and databases containing annotated games.
Common confusions
The system and PGN are the same
The system defines a visual vocabulary for comments. PGN defines how to store a game and can encode many of those comments as numbers.
View termAn arrow always points across the board
In several signs, direction identifies a side rather than the physical route of a piece.
Sources
- 1.System of Signs, Chess Informant / ChessBase
- 2.Standard: Portable Game Notation Specification and Implementation Guide, Steven J. Edwards (coordinator)
- 3.Proposal to encode symbols for chess notation, Unicode Consortium / ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2
