King's Indian Defense, Averbakh Variation

A King's Indian variation where White actively places the queenside bishop to restrain Black's central pawn advance.

This page is temporarily shown in English. Complete localization will be added in a later stage.

Explanation

In the King's Indian, Black allows White to build a broad center with pawns on d4 and e4, then tries to attack it by advancing the e-pawn or c-pawn. These are pawn breaks because they contact the opposing structure and try to open lines. In the Averbakh, one white bishop goes to e2 and the bishop that begins on c1 develops to g5. The coordinates name squares by file and rank.

The g5-bishop attacks Black's knight on f6. While Black's pawn remains on e7, that knight is not pinned because the pawn still blocks the diagonal toward the queen on d8. If Black advances the e-pawn, the diagonal opens and the knight can become relatively pinned: moving it would expose the queen to attack. The central advance therefore requires care. Black can also attack the bishop with the h-pawn, develop another knight, or challenge the center with the c-pawn.

White keeps flexible castling choices. Castling is the special move that relocates the king and a rook together to improve king safety. The setup has a cost: White has spent moves developing both bishops while the g1-knight remains on its starting square, so Black may try to attack the center before White completes development. The first uses the h-pawn to prevent a black knight jump to g4.

Common confusions

Averbakh versus Makogonov

The Averbakh places White's bishops on e2 and g5. The Makogonov begins with an h-pawn advance and has not yet committed the c1-bishop.

Related terms

© 2026 MindZug