Annotated game
Anderssen versus Dufresne, 1852
Adolf Anderssen · Jean Dufresne · 1852 · 1-0
A race between two attacks
Anderssen gives up pawns to activate his pieces. Dufresne finds counterplay against White’s king, so the beauty of the finish does not mean every earlier move was best. Study which threats require an immediate reply and which can wait.
Explanation
The Evergreen Game is Adolf Anderssen's game against Jean Dufresne, whose earliest known publication appeared in 1852. Many books place it in Berlin, although the earliest known sources did not give a venue and the historical evidence does not establish the location beyond doubt.
The attack began with the Evans Gambit: Anderssen gave up pawns to gain activity and open the game. Dufresne did more than defend a king that remained uncastled. He activated his rooks and created threats against White's king. This is the tension that distinguishes the game from a straightforward attacking display: the open lines could serve both sides.
19.Rad1 brings that risk into focus. Anderssen brought his last rook into the attack without moving the knight threatened by the opposing queen. When Dufresne captured it, White replied with a chain of checks that included sacrificing a rook and the queen. The double check forced Black's king to keep moving, without allowing its other pieces to interrupt the pursuit. Black's counterattack was real, but the chosen continuation left no time to carry it out before mate.
A move admired and debated
The name also belongs to the history of the game's commentary. In his posthumous tribute to Anderssen, published in The Field on 29 March 1879, used the word “evergreen” in his note to 19.Rad1 itself. He admired an idea that, in his view, would have stood out even in a composed problem, yet had arisen in actual play. This is a specific record of his praise, not proof that the nickname was first coined on that occasion.
In a signed revision published in 2003, examined adequate defences for Black and judged 19.Be4 somewhat stronger than 19.Rad1. Yet he still valued the victory achieved with the rook move. That contrast sharpens the Evergreen Game's appeal: its finish is memorable, but it does not establish that the entire attack was inevitable.
Replay historical games
1852. Traditionally placed in Berlin as an informal game; the venue is not established by the earliest accounts examined in the historical research.
Anderssen vs. Dufresne, the Evergreen Game of 1852
Play as Adolf Anderssen, White
Turn development tempi into central activity and calculate an attack with both kings under threat.
London, 1851. Informal game. The exact date and venue remain disputed.
Anderssen vs. Kieseritzky, London 1851
Play as Adolf Anderssen, White
Coordinate pawns and pieces against an exposed queen while tracking the cost of sacrifices.
Common confusions
The Immortal Game
They are different games: the Evergreen was against Dufresne, while the Immortal was against Kieseritzky.
Berlin as a proven venue
Berlin is traditional, but the earliest known publications did not specify the location.
Sources
- 1.The Evergreen Game (Anderssen v Dufresne), Chess Notes (Edward Winter)
- 2.Anderssen’s Evergreen Game: Every Move Explained For Chess Beginners, NM Sam Copeland, Chess.com
- 3.Evergreen Game, Wikipedia
- 4.Garry Kasparov’s Great Predecessors: Follow-up #1, Garry Kasparov, ChessBase
- 5.The Field, 29 de marzo de 1879, p. 363: Anderssen contra Dufresne, Wilhelm Steinitz, The Field; facsímil reproducido por Edward Winter
- 6.Chess Player's Chronicle, 1 de mayo de 1879, p. 104: registro de la Siempreviva, Wilhelm Steinitz, Chess Player's Chronicle; reimpresión de The Field reproducida por Edward Winter
- 7.Chess Player's Chronicle, 1 de mayo de 1879, p. 105: nota a 19.Rad1, Wilhelm Steinitz, Chess Player's Chronicle; reimpresión de The Field reproducida por Edward Winter
