Explanation
△ is read as with the idea of. It connects a move to the later plan, threat, or continuation that explains why the move was chosen. An annotation may show a quiet move, add △, and then give the pawn advance or piece route the player intends.
△ Rh3
The route does not yet exist
The rook on cannot reach directly. The bishop on already looks toward , but the rook needs preparation before joining the pressure.
The sign explains purpose, not quality. It does not claim that the move is good, that the idea will work, or that the following sequence is forced. The opponent may choose another reply, prevent the plan, or accept a different consequence.
In NAG lists, where NAG means Numeric Annotation Glyph, it appears as a Chess Informant proposal for preserving this relationship in a digital game. Its main value is to separate the move that was played from the strategic or tactical reason the annotator wants to show.
Common confusions
A forced variation
A continuation after △ illustrates the intention. It does not mean every opposing reply must lead to that sequence.
Sources
- 1.System of Signs, Chess Informant / ChessBase
- 2.NAG Values, Scid vs. PC
- 3.Proposal to encode symbols for chess notation, Unicode Consortium / ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2
